Antitrust Laws

Antitrust Laws

Name:

Institution:

Antitrust Laws

The case of United States versus Flamingo Industries (USA) LTD. Et al, argued on December 1, 2003 and decided in February 25, 2004, is one the most intriguing and involving antitrust claims. The lawsuit was filed by the Flamingo Industries after the United Postal Service terminated their contract for providing mail sacks. After the termination, the company sued the government owned service claiming, the reason for contract termination was in order to create a monopoly in the production of sacks thus reducing competition. The District Court ruled in favor of the Postal Service stating that it was not subject to liability under the Federal Antitrust Laws (SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STAFF, 2004). The reasoning supporting this ruling was that the Postal service was government owned thus could not be held liable or accused of retracting the contract due to antitrust laws or ambitions thus it was granted immunity.

 The ruling was fair and reasonable and served the intended consumer. This is because the antitrust laws are made for privatized organizations and companies but governmental entities are offered limited immunity depending on the charges forwarded. The most interesting part about this case was the presentation of the clauses from the constitution in support of Postal Service thus refuting the charges. Using the clause on Antitrust Laws from the Sherman Act where it mentions the word ‘person’ to represent privatized organizations, the forwarded argument was that the United States could not be categorized as a person. This is because it would bring terrible damages claim for its own alleged antitrust injuries.( SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STAFF, 2004)  If asked to handle this case, I would seek to determine the valid reasons why the Flamingo’s contract was cancelled and the valid reasons provided by the government officials. The findings provided would allow me to form a stronger case whether the clients was accused falsely or not.

Reference:

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STAFF. (2004). UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVIVE v. FLAMINGO INDUSTRIES (USA) LTD. Al. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus .Retrieved from http://www.stolaf.edu/people/becker/antitrust/summaries/02-1290.htm

How to place an order?

Take a few steps to place an order on our site:

  • Fill out the form and state the deadline.
  • Calculate the price of your order and pay for it with your credit card.
  • When the order is placed, we select a suitable writer to complete it based on your requirements.
  • Stay in contact with the writer and discuss vital details of research.
  • Download a preview of the research paper. Satisfied with the outcome? Press “Approve.”

Feel secure when using our service

It's important for every customer to feel safe. Thus, at Supreme Assignments, we take care of your security.

Financial security You can safely pay for your order using secure payment systems.
Personal security Any personal information about our customers is private. No other person can get access to it.
Academic security To deliver no-plagiarism samples, we use a specially-designed software to check every finished paper.
Web security This website is protected from illegal breaks. We constantly update our privacy management.

Get assistance with placing your order. Clarify any questions about our services. Contact our support team. They are available 24\7.

Still thinking about where to hire experienced authors and how to boost your grades? Place your order on our website and get help with any paper you need. We’ll meet your expectations.

Order now Get a quote