In Hot Politics, the participants discuss the sensitive yet crucial topic of global warming. One of the key concerns addressed in this conversation is the effectiveness of the federal government’s actions in protecting the environment from the effects of this worldwide problem. For instance, Peter Bull indicates that the centralized administration of the United States has been reluctant in solving this problem despite the emphasis by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) regarding the avoidable link between global warming and fossil fuels. The policies enacted by former presidents about this global problem have had a significant impact on the regional, national, and international efforts of protecting the ecological system from further damage by the catalysts of global warming. The concerns raised by Peter Bull are comparable to those highlighted by other environmental crusaders.
As indicated in this television program, one of the actions of former regimes that exhibit the disinclination of the federal government of the United States in ending the complex issue of global warming involves the position of President George Bush regarding the industrial emission of greenhouse gases. He emphasized that the carbon dioxide discharge targets preset by the relevant national agencies ought to be voluntary. In addition, he withdrew from the Kyoto Treaty, an aspect that weakened the existing campaigns for environmental protection at the national and intercontinental levels. Similarly, President Bill Clinton was reluctant in acquiring the approval of the Senate on the Kyoto Treaty. The environmentalists in this discussion conclude by asserting that the unsatisfying actions of the centralized government of the United States not only affect the national efforts of environmental protection, but they also have a negative effect on the international fight against global warming.
Based on the aspects discussed in this debate, I concur with the arguments of the crusaders of environmental protection regarding the evident unwillingness of the American federal administration in fighting global warming. This problem has resulted in the massive destruction of the natural environment. Human beings, plants, and animals have had to search for alternative habitats owing to the negative effects of climate change. These problems are apparent in all geographical regions of the world and require the participation of stakeholders in the private and public subsections in order to implement practical strategies effectively. For this reason, the government of the United States ought to improve their enthusiasm in facilitating such constructive activities through the endorsement of relevant policies as well as provision of the needed resources.
Furthermore, the actions of former regimes such as those led by President Clinton and Bush are somewhat responsible for the minimal achievements in the environmental protection programs. Policies are an effective tool in the formulation and implementation of any strategic plan. Accordingly, the centralized administration of this nation should understand that their efforts in dealing with this problem act as an effective incentive that will result in satisfactory outcomes at the national and global levels. Some of the actions that would aid in implementing the strategies formulated to handle this issue include pushing legislators to endorse rules that compel all industries to modify their operations in order to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases. This also includes the reduced use of fossil fuels through the invention of alternative energy sources. In addition, the federal government ought to support national agencies dealing with this environmental problem by formulating and facilitating the implementation of laws that acknowledge the responsibility of each person in ending this menace.